You are not logged in...  [Login]          

• Network
  Cleantech Experts
• Knowledge
  Library Events Topics
• About ASK
  Objectives Advantages for Partners Content and Experts Advertising in ASK
• My ASK
  Communication Library My information Messages Contacts My articles

Search: 

Schizophrenic Stakes of GMO Regulation in the European Union

EU legislation on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is the most stringent legislation governing the matter in the world, laying down strict conditions relating to labelling, traceability, threshold and release on the market. In light of a recent Commission proposal to amend Directive 2001/18, which currently regulates the release of GMOs on the European market, this article asks whether and on what basis such stringency is justified. This is done through an in depth analysis of the EU regulatory framework for GMOs while at the same time highlighting the multiple interests at stake (environmental, scientific, industrial, political, national and European).

This article argues that the European institutions should proceed to amend Directive 2001/18 on the basis of a detailed examination of the benefits as well as the risks that GMOs present. This article, however, raises concern that the European regulatory framework will focus exclusively on the risks or on political concerns relating to GMOs instead, for it is a fear of GMOs that seems to permeate the system from top to bottom.

Copyright:	© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Source:	Issue 02/2012 (Juni 2012)
Pages:	10
Price inc. VAT:	€ 41,65
Autor:	Claudio Mereu
Send Article	Add to shopping cart	Comment article

These articles might be interesting:

All About That Risk? A (Re-)Assessment of the CJEU’s Reasoning in the “Genome Editing” Case
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (5/2019)
Der Europäische Gerichtshof hat mit Urteil vom 25.7.2018 (Rs. C‑528/16) entschieden, dass Organismen, deren Erbgut mit Verfahren der sog. ortsspezifischen Mutagenese verändert wurde, dem europäischen Gentechnikrecht unterfallen. Die Entscheidung und ihre Konsequenzen sind seitdem Gegenstand reger Auseinandersetzungen.

Genomeditierung ist Gentechnik
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (5/2019)
Eine kritische Analyse des EuGH-Urteils Confédération paysanne u.a.

CRISPR-Plants & Co. – the Quest for Adequate Risk Regulation
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (11/2017)
Modern Plant Breeding Techniques and the Current Legal Framework for Risk Regulation in the European Union

The Member States’ Long and Winding Road to Partial Regulatory Autonomy in Cultivating Genetically Modified Crops in the EU
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (6/2013)
Member States wishing to cultivate genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have always been a minority in the EU. Only eight out of twenty-seven have experienced transgenic agriculture. Throughout the years, the opposition to this form of farming has become a genuinely transnational phenomenon given that many regions of different European countries declared themselves GMO-free. Moreover, Member States such as Austria, Luxembourg, Greece, Poland and, most recently, Hungary officially banned transgenic agriculture within their borders altogether. France and Germany suspended the cultivation of GM maize MON 810, respectively in 2008 and 2009. In addition, the EU has previously authorized only two GM crops: GM maize MON 810 (authorization renewed in 2008) and GM potato EH92-527-1 (2010), known as the ‘Amflora potato.’ The cautious approach towards transgenic farming is also witnessed by the long and contested process of renewal of the permit to cultivate GM maize MON 810 and the issue of the authorization for the Amflora potato. All this shows that in the EU there has always been a very limited tolerance for transgenic agriculture.

Can Science Tame Politics: The Collapse of the New GMO Regime in the EU
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (6/2012)
On 2 March 2010 the European Commission authorised the cultivation of a BASF’s genetically modified potato “Amflora” throughout the European Union. This came after a tortuous process commenced in 1996 and so far it is the only authorisation of a GMO for cultivation in EU since the current regulation was established. On 3 March 2010, President Barroso announced that the Commission intends to propose amendments to the current regulation to allow the Member States to prohibit the cultivation of GMO authorised for cultivation in the EU and it did so on June 13, 2010. This is one of the very few cases where decision-making power is effectively devolved back from Union to state level; it is even more impressive that this is happening on the initiative of the Commission and despite the obvious negative consequences for the internal market. In the meantime BASF botched the 2011 growing season for Amflora in Sweden and in 2012 announced that it withdraws its GM crops from the EU. This article follows the saga purports to find the reasons why it entailed an immediate change.