As a volcano refugee in Frankfurt, it was rather interesting to see a slow motion regulatory science disaster taking place. On April 14 2010 the Icelandic volcano Eyjafjallajökull erupted sending millions of tons of ash into the upper atmosphere. The ash cloud, blown by the prevailing winds, moved down over northern Europe. European air traffic authorities, following well established and widely published safety protocols, began shutting down the air transport system due to the well known hazard of volcano ash.
The shutdown lasted 6 days and soon became an unequal political contest between airline money on the one side and regulatory science on the other. In a classic case of shooting the messenger bringing bad news the responsible airline parties tried to shift the blame for shutdown to the regulators, while nervous governments quailed before the bullying of the airline executives. Demands for compensation and accusations of regulatory incompetence filled the media. Despite their 25 years of pointing out the hazards of volcanic ash and its implications for air travel, volcano scientists and the air traffic system that relied on them were steamrollered into political oblivion and public humiliation by the combined financial and political clout of ambitious airline executives, their trade association (IATA) and cowardly politicians. Practically overnight the fundamental regulatory system, based on avoiding volcanic ash was jettisoned for what was declared to be a previously unknown “safe” level of ash. While the ultimate dénouement of this débâcle will not be known for some times, a taxpayer bailout for the airlines that refused to prepare for a natural disaster is certainly being pushed. The implications for sciencebased safety regulation are also ominous.
| Copyright: | © Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH | |
| Source: | Issue 02/2010 (Juni 2010) | |
| Pages: | 7 | |
| Price inc. VAT: | € 41,65 | |
| Autor: | Prof. Emeritus Dr. Jur. Vincent M. Brannigan | |
| Send Article | Add to shopping cart | Comment article |
The European Regulatory Response to the Volcanic Ash Crisis between Fragmentation and Integration
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (6/2010)
More than twenty years after the EU eliminated its internal land borders, the Union still lacks an integrated airspace. This seems to be the most immediate regulatory lesson of the recent volcanic ash crisis. Yet more research is needed before establishing its net effects.
Entwicklung der Emissionsgrenzwerte in der Abfall- und Energiewirtschaft
– Europa und Deutschland –
© Thomé-Kozmiensky Verlag GmbH (6/2009)
In Europa kann – bezogen auf verbindliche Emissionsgrenzwerte – ein grundsätzlicher Unterschied der Regelungsphilosophien festgestellt werden. Ein zahlenmäßig sehr dominierendes Lager möchte so wenig wie möglich verbindliche Grenzwerte und ein hohes Maß an Flexibilität seitens der Mitgliedsstaaten. Dieses Lager wird angeführt durch Großbritannien.
Die TRGS 517
© Rhombos-Verlag (9/2008)
Bericht zur Fachtagung vom 13. Juni 2008
Reporting of food waste in the EU – Results of current estimates in Germany
© Lehrstuhl für Abfallverwertungstechnik und Abfallwirtschaft der Montanuniversität Leoben (11/2020)
In February 2019, the German Federal Cabinet adopted the 'National Strategy for Reducing Food Waste', setting a framework for the future direction of this initiative. Among other things, it stipulated that an inter-ministerial "Indicator 12.3 Working Group" should prepare the data bases and methods for nationwide balancing of food waste generation (baseline). Based on existing 2015 data, this status quo analysis will be used as a starting point to agree on milestones for the respective sectors.
The circular packaging design guideline and holistic sustainability assessment in circular economy
© Lehrstuhl für Abfallverwertungstechnik und Abfallwirtschaft der Montanuniversität Leoben (11/2020)
The FH Campus Wien Circular Packaging Design Guideline provide recommendations for circular design for the whole supply chain. Circular design is a necessary prerequisite to achieve the goals of the European Circular Economy Package which requires full recyclability of packaging by 2030. Circular packaging should re-duce resource consumption and environmental impacts of packaging. The assessment of packaging sustainability requires the calculation of direct and indirect environmental impacts and circularity at the same time. A method for holistic sustainability assessment of packaging has been proposed by FH Campus Wien and developed in an ECR-working group (Efficient Consumer Response) with the participation of a number of companies along the whole supply chain (brand owners, retailers, packaging manufacturers and packaging systems).